[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1280774463.2703.6.camel@sbsiddha-MOBL3.sc.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 11:41:03 -0700
From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: mark init_workqueues() as early_initcall()
On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 12:07 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Audited and tested. It should be fine. Patch applied and pushed out
> to linux-next. How shall we route the second patch?
>
Tejun, v2 version of the second patch had both x86 and ia64 changes.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128053714303108&w=2
So I am ok if you carry this with the rest of your workqueue changes
that touch these same files.
thanks,
suresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists