linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] workqueue: mark init_workqueues() as early

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C596E97.6060508@kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:43:51 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
CC:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: mark init_workqueues() as early_initcall()

On 08/02/2010 08:41 PM, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 12:07 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Audited and tested.  It should be fine.  Patch applied and pushed out
>> to linux-next.  How shall we route the second patch?
>>
> 
> Tejun, v2 version of the second patch had both x86 and ia64 changes.
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128053714303108&w=2
> 
> So I am ok if you carry this with the rest of your workqueue changes
> that touch these same files.

Andrew seemed to have already picked up the patch.  I've sent the pull
request with the first patch.

Thank you.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/