lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1280778048-6208-1-git-send-email-stefani@seibold.net>
Date:	Mon,  2 Aug 2010 21:40:48 +0200
From:	stefani@...bold.net
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@...il.com>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>,
	David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
	Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@...el.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	stefani@...bold.net
Subject: [PATCH] Change struct flchip_shared spinlock locking into mutex

From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>

This patch prevent to schedule while atomic by changing the
flchip_shared spinlock into a mutex. This should be save since no atomic
path will use this lock.

This patch is based on linux kernel 2.6.35. Please apply.

It was requested by Arnd Bergmann and Vasiliy Kulikov.

- Stefani

shared->

Signed-off-by: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
---
 drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c |   20 ++++++++++----------
 include/linux/mtd/flashchip.h       |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c
index 62f3ea9..3364061 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c
@@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ static int cfi_intelext_partition_fixup(struct mtd_info *mtd,
 		chip = &newcfi->chips[0];
 		for (i = 0; i < cfi->numchips; i++) {
 			shared[i].writing = shared[i].erasing = NULL;
-			spin_lock_init(&shared[i].lock);
+			mutex_init(&shared[i].lock);
 			for (j = 0; j < numparts; j++) {
 				*chip = cfi->chips[i];
 				chip->start += j << partshift;
@@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ static int get_chip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, unsigned long adr
 		 */
 		struct flchip_shared *shared = chip->priv;
 		struct flchip *contender;
-		spin_lock(&shared->lock);
+		mutex_lock(&shared->lock);
 		contender = shared->writing;
 		if (contender && contender != chip) {
 			/*
@@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ static int get_chip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, unsigned long adr
 			 * get_chip returns success we're clear to go ahead.
 			 */
 			ret = mutex_trylock(&contender->mutex);
-			spin_unlock(&shared->lock);
+			mutex_unlock(&shared->lock);
 			if (!ret)
 				goto retry;
 			mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static int get_chip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, unsigned long adr
 				mutex_unlock(&contender->mutex);
 				return ret;
 			}
-			spin_lock(&shared->lock);
+			mutex_lock(&shared->lock);
 
 			/* We should not own chip if it is already
 			 * in FL_SYNCING state. Put contender and retry. */
@@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ static int get_chip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, unsigned long adr
 		 * on this chip. Sleep. */
 		if (mode == FL_ERASING && shared->erasing
 		    && shared->erasing->oldstate == FL_ERASING) {
-			spin_unlock(&shared->lock);
+			mutex_unlock(&shared->lock);
 			set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 			add_wait_queue(&chip->wq, &wait);
 			mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
@@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ static int get_chip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, unsigned long adr
 		shared->writing = chip;
 		if (mode == FL_ERASING)
 			shared->erasing = chip;
-		spin_unlock(&shared->lock);
+		mutex_unlock(&shared->lock);
 	}
 	ret = chip_ready(map, chip, adr, mode);
 	if (ret == -EAGAIN)
@@ -959,7 +959,7 @@ static void put_chip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, unsigned long ad
 
 	if (chip->priv) {
 		struct flchip_shared *shared = chip->priv;
-		spin_lock(&shared->lock);
+		mutex_lock(&shared->lock);
 		if (shared->writing == chip && chip->oldstate == FL_READY) {
 			/* We own the ability to write, but we're done */
 			shared->writing = shared->erasing;
@@ -967,7 +967,7 @@ static void put_chip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, unsigned long ad
 				/* give back ownership to who we loaned it from */
 				struct flchip *loaner = shared->writing;
 				mutex_lock(&loaner->mutex);
-				spin_unlock(&shared->lock);
+				mutex_unlock(&shared->lock);
 				mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
 				put_chip(map, loaner, loaner->start);
 				mutex_lock(&chip->mutex);
@@ -985,11 +985,11 @@ static void put_chip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, unsigned long ad
 			 * Don't let the switch below mess things up since
 			 * we don't have ownership to resume anything.
 			 */
-			spin_unlock(&shared->lock);
+			mutex_unlock(&shared->lock);
 			wake_up(&chip->wq);
 			return;
 		}
-		spin_unlock(&shared->lock);
+		mutex_unlock(&shared->lock);
 	}
 
 	switch(chip->oldstate) {
diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/flashchip.h b/include/linux/mtd/flashchip.h
index f43e9b4..23cc10f 100644
--- a/include/linux/mtd/flashchip.h
+++ b/include/linux/mtd/flashchip.h
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct flchip {
 /* This is used to handle contention on write/erase operations
    between partitions of the same physical chip. */
 struct flchip_shared {
-	spinlock_t lock;
+	struct mutex lock;
 	struct flchip *writing;
 	struct flchip *erasing;
 };
-- 
1.7.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ