linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Change struct flchip_shared spinlock locking into mutex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201008031025.52409.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Tue, 3 Aug 2010 10:25:52 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	stefani@...bold.net
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@...il.com>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>,
	David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
	"Hans-Christian Egtvedt" <hans-christian.egtvedt@...el.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change struct flchip_shared spinlock locking into mutex

On Monday 02 August 2010, stefani@...bold.net wrote:
> From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
> 
> This patch prevent to schedule while atomic by changing the
> flchip_shared spinlock into a mutex. This should be save since no atomic
> path will use this lock.

I don't know this code well, but the patch looks correct and seems
to be needed.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/