[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C574BEE.7060802@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:51:26 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 2/2] x86: more early console output from compressed/misc.c
On 08/02/2010 03:46 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> First, I'm not quite sure which 1/2 patch you're expecting this to be
> compiled against.
-v3
>
> On 08/02/2010 03:30 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> + if (debug) {
>> + putstr("decompress_kernel:\n");
>> + printf(" input: [0x%lx-0x%lx], output: 0x%lx, heap: [0x%lx-0x%lx]\n",
>> + (unsigned long)input_data,
>> + (unsigned long)input_data + input_len - 1,
>> + (unsigned long)output,
>> + (unsigned long)heap,
>> + (unsigned long)heap + BOOT_HEAP_SIZE - 1);
>> + }
>> +
>
> This seems to be the only user of printf() in the code. As such, I
> really suspect it's not worth pulling in all of printf(). I'd be
> willing to be convinced, but if so I need (a) a concrete usage case, and
> (b) it should be a separate patch.
ok, will drop printf.
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists