lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1FB5E1D5CA062146B38059374562DF728380C2F4@TK5EX14MBXC126.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Date:	Tue, 3 Aug 2010 18:21:50 +0000
From:	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC:	"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"'devel@...verdev.osuosl.org'" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	"'virtualization@...ts.osdl.org'" <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
	"'gregkh@...e.de'" <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Hank Janssen <hjanssen@...rosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] staging: hv: Fix missing functions for
 net_device_ops (resubmit)

> From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@...ah.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 9:30 PM
> Why put the subject in the body of the email?  This forces me to edit
> it again :(

Sure, I'll remove it.

> > functions. We need to put them into net_device_ops. For example,
> > eth_change_mtu prevents setting MTU beyond 1500. This is necessary
> > because we don't support jumbo frame at this time.
> 
> What does this mean?  Is it a bug?  Just not going as fast as possible?
> Something else?

Yes, it's a bug when porting Linux IC from 2.6.27 to 2.6.32. In 2.6.27,
the default functions for Ethernet, like eth_change_mtu(), were assigned
by ether_setup(). But in 2.6.32, these function pointers moved to
net_device_ops structure and no longer be assigned in ether_setup(). So we
need to set these functions in our driver code. It will ensure the MTU won't
be set beyong 1500. Otherwise, this can cause an error on the server side,
because the HyperV linux driver doesn't support jumbo frame yet.

> >   It affects kernel 2.6.32 and later, which are all versions
> > containing Hyper-V drivers.
> 
> So is this fixing a bug that needs to be backported to these older
> kernels (i.e. the staging tree?)  Is this something that is causing
> people problems?

Yes it should be backported. The bug can cause error on guest and host.

Thanks,

- Haiyang

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ