[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100803215137.GU26313@bicker>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 23:51:38 +0200
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] arch/powerpc/kernel: Drop unnecessary null test
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 11:35:17PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
> index 6ddb795..62dd363 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
> @@ -336,8 +336,7 @@ static void __devinit __of_scan_bus(struct device_node *node,
> if (dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE ||
> dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_CARDBUS) {
> struct device_node *child = pci_device_to_OF_node(dev);
> - if (dev)
> - of_scan_pci_bridge(child, dev);
> + of_scan_pci_bridge(child, dev);
The intention was probably to check "child" instead of "dev".
pci_device_to_OF_node() can return NULL. On the other hand the code
has been this way for a year and no one has complained...
regards,
dan carpenter
> }
> }
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists