[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1280873146.23348.7.camel@dhcp231-200.rdu.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:05:46 -0400
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
jmorris@...ei.org, sds@...ho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH] flex_array: add helpers to get and put to make
pointers easy to use
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 13:55 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Aug 2010, Eric Paris wrote:
>
> > Getting and putting arrays of pointers with flex arrays is a PITA. You
> > have to remember to pass &ptr to the _put and you have to do weird and
> > wacky casting to get the ptr back from the _get. Add two functions
> > flex_array_get_ptr() and flex_array_put_ptr() to handle all of the magic.
> >
>
> There's no code currently in the tree that uses the flex array interface,
> so is this something that you've encountered in practice or only by
> inspection? If it's the former, is that code on its way for 2.6.36?
I did decide to use flex_arrays on code intended for .36
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=6371dcd36f649d9d07823f31400618155a20dde1
> I'm hoping distros aren't creating internal dependencies on this interface
> that could practically be removed from upstream at any time given its lack
> of popularity.
I've got some more patches that I'm looking towards .37 which would use
the _ptr helpers I suggested:
http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=128086475312322&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=128086558513723&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists