[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <811063.41186.qm@web37605.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 00:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alex Dubov <oakad@...oo.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MEMSTICK: fix hangs on unexpected device removal in mspro_blk
--- On Tue, 3/8/10, Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com> wrote:
> Now that del_gendisk syncs, we better
> start rejecting requests right away.
I don't quite see why this change is needed. My understanding is, user
accessible interface should be marked as removed as early, as possible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c | 5
> +++--
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
> b/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
> index 8327e24..8d27c13 100644
> --- a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
> +++ b/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
> @@ -1330,13 +1330,14 @@ static void
> mspro_block_remove(struct memstick_dev *card)
> struct mspro_block_data *msb =
> memstick_get_drvdata(card);
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - del_gendisk(msb->disk);
> - dev_dbg(&card->dev, "mspro block
> remove\n");
> spin_lock_irqsave(&msb->q_lock,
> flags);
> msb->eject = 1;
> blk_start_queue(msb->queue);
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msb->q_lock, flags);
>
> + del_gendisk(msb->disk);
> + dev_dbg(&card->dev, "mspro block
> remove\n");
> +
> blk_cleanup_queue(msb->queue);
> msb->queue = NULL;
>
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists