linux-kernel - Re: How to track down abysmal performance ata - raid1 - crypto - vg/lv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100804092122.GA2998@infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 4 Aug 2010 05:21:22 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How to track down abysmal performance ata - raid1 - crypto -
 vg/lv - xfs

On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:13:17AM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > show these problems?
> 
> No, 2.6.31 to 2.6.34 show similar behaviour.

Ok, so it's been around for a while.  Can you test the write speed of
each individual device layer by doing a large read from it, using:

	dd if=<device> of=/dev/null bs=8k iflag=direct

where device starts with the /dev/sda* device, and goes up to the MD
device, the dm-crypt device and the LV.  And yes, it's safe to read
from the device while it's otherwise mounted/used.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/