linux-kernel - Re: How to track down abysmal performance ata - raid1 - crypto - vg/lv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201008041116.09822@zmi.at>
Date:	Wed, 4 Aug 2010 11:16:09 +0200
From:	Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@...it-management.at>
To:	Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How to track down abysmal performance ata - raid1 - crypto - vg/lv - xfs

On Mittwoch, 4. August 2010 Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> The read performance is abysmal. The ata devices can be ruled out, as
>  hdparm
> 
> resulted in acceptable performance:
> > Timing cached reads:   9444 MB in  2.00 seconds = 4733.59 MB/sec
> > Timing buffered disk reads:  298 MB in  3.02 seconds =  98.73
> > MB/sec

Has that system been running acceptable before? If yes, what has been 
changed that performance is down now?

Or is it a new setup? Then why is it in production already?

Can you run bonnie on that system?
What does "dd if=<your device> of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1024" say?
What does "dd if=/dev/zero of=<your device> bs=1m count=1024" say?


-- 
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31

****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ******
http://www.it-podcast.at/aktuelle-sendung.html

// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)