| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 08:24:32 +0200 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [AppArmor #7 0/13] AppArmor security module On Fri 2010-07-30 09:05:23, James Morris wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, John Johansen wrote: > > > This is the seveth general posting of the newest version of the > > AppArmor security module it has been rewritten to use the security_path > > hooks instead of the previous vfs approach. The current implementation > > is aimed at being as semantically close to previous versions of AppArmor > > as possible while using the existing LSM infrastructure. > > Applied to > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6#next > > Please carry out any further development against the above tree. > > Note that I added the patch below to update AA against the latest > version of path_truncate: Ok, so now we have two name-based "security" modules. Can we at least drop TOMOYO? That seems to have all apparmor disadvantages plus some more... -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists