[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100809095619.GA1621@arch.tripp.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:56:19 +0200
From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
walt <w41ter@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH wq#for-linus] workqueue: workqueue_cpu_callback()
should be cpu_notifier not hotcpu_notifier
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:49:00AM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 08/09/2010 11:46 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > This fixes the boot problem here. Thanks.
>
> Great. May I add your Tested-by?
Sure.
Tested-by: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
> > (The drm delayed enqueue problem, which I mentioned earlier still
> > persists.)
>
> Yeah, I'm looking into it now but it looks like the error message is
> simply spurious. queue_delayed_work() returns 1 if the work was
> actually queued and 0 if it was already pending and thus the function
> call was no-op. output_poll_execute() is incorrectly interpreting 1
> return as error. I'll look through the history and try to find out
> whether/how wq changes affected the behavior, but the fix is most
> likely simply killing the message.
Yes, this looks like a cosmetic issue and I observe no other graphics
problems at all.
--
»A man who doesn't know he is in prison can never escape.«
William S. Burroughs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists