linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for August 6 (block git tree)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C617F87.6090300@oracle.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:34:15 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for August 6 (block git tree)

On 08/10/10 09:14, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 08/10/2010 12:11 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 08/10/10 09:07, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 08/10/2010 11:59 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:56:34 -0400 Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 08/10/2010 11:54 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>>> On 08/10/10 08:51, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>>>> On 08/10/2010 11:37 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:06:00 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 08/06/10 12:04, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:27:58 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> As the merge window is open, please do not add 2.6.37 material to your
>>>>>>>>>>> linux-next included trees until after 2.6.36-rc1.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Changes since 20100805:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The block tree lost its build failure and a conflict.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lots of source files now need <linux/blk_types.h>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> mm/filemap.c:2164: error: 'REQ_WRITE' undeclared
>>>>>>>>>> fs/read_write.c:362: error: 'REQ_WRITE' undeclared
>>>>>>>>>> fs/splice.c:1108: error: 'REQ_WRITE' undeclared
>>>>>>>>>> fs/aio.c:1496: error: 'REQ_WRITE' undeclared
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/memstick/core/memstick.c:272: error: 'REQ_WRITE' undeclared
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/memstick/host/tifm_ms.c:218: error: 'REQ_WRITE' undeclared
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/memstick/host/jmb38x_ms.c:333: error: 'REQ_WRITE' undeclared
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/staging/spectra/ffsport.c:277: error: 'REQ_TYPE_LINUX_BLOCK' undeclared
>>>>>>>>>> fs/compat.c:1274: error: 'REQ_WRITE' undeclared
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sorry, I see that this has already been fixed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> s/fixed/addressed/  but not yet merged into linux-next.
>>>>>>>> Can we get that fixed, please?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which patch are you referencing?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Jens,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe I misread last week's email about linux/blk_types.h.
>>>>>> (It was about being exported, not about being #included.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are still lots of these files that have the errors listed above.
>>>>>> Has there been a patch for those?
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the .config?
>>>>
>>>> I have a bunch of them that fail.  Here are 2 of them,
>>>> one with CONFIG_BLOCK=y and one with CONFIG_BLOCK=n.
>>>>
>>>> I can give you more if you want them.
>>>
>>> Looks like the types are badly hidden behind CONFIG_BLOCK.
>>> So this should fix the CONFIG_BLOCK=n part at least. What
>>> was the compile error with CONFIG_BLOCK=y?
>>
>> Ugh, it is a staging driver with lots of other problems.
>> (spectra)  I wouldn't worry about it for now.
>>
>> I'll test this patch.  Thanks.
> 
> OK great, I'll push this one out.


Ack.  Looks good here.  Thanks.

-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/