[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100810100228.525d952e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:02:28 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for August 10 (acpi/apei)
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:56:01 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As the merge window is open, please do not add 2.6.37 material to your
> linux-next included trees until after 2.6.36-rc1.
>
> Changes since 20100809:
on 32-bit i386:
drivers/acpi/apei/erst-dbg.c:106: warning: format '%lx' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ssize_t'
erst-dbg.c:(.text+0xede6d): undefined reference to `__get_user_X'
For the __get_user_X() call, in erst-dbg.c::erst_dbg_ioctl():
case APEI_ERST_CLEAR_RECORD:
rc = get_user(record_id, (u64 __user *)arg);
-> arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
#define __get_user_8(__ret_gu, __val_gu, ptr) \
__get_user_x(X, __ret_gu, __val_gu, ptr)
#else
#define __get_user_8(__ret_gu, __val_gu, ptr) \
__get_user_x(8, __ret_gu, __val_gu, ptr)
#endif
so is __get_user_8() not supported on X86_32?
or is this something else?
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists