[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikwHaKpLdRdxmZj6JDJnsZ+o-jzbVcXhRW3Jmd9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:18:51 +0300
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
david@...g.hm, Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arve@...roid.com, mjg59@...f.ucam.org, pavel@....cz,
florian@...kler.org, rjw@...k.pl, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, menage@...gle.com,
david-b@...bell.net, James.Bottomley@...e.de, arjan@...radead.org,
swmike@....pp.se, galibert@...ox.com, dipankar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> But wouldn't an office suite run as a power-oblivious application on an
> Android device? After all, office applications do not need to run when
> the screen is turned off, so these the applications do not need to use
> suspend blockers.
Ideally the system would be suspended even when the screen is on. If
there are no "trusted" applications running at the same time, then
openoffice wouldn't load at all. Right?
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists