| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:18:51 +0300 From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com> To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, david@...g.hm, Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arve@...roid.com, mjg59@...f.ucam.org, pavel@....cz, florian@...kler.org, rjw@...k.pl, stern@...land.harvard.edu, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, menage@...gle.com, david-b@...bell.net, James.Bottomley@...e.de, arjan@...radead.org, swmike@....pp.se, galibert@...ox.com, dipankar@...ibm.com Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > But wouldn't an office suite run as a power-oblivious application on an > Android device? After all, office applications do not need to run when > the screen is turned off, so these the applications do not need to use > suspend blockers. Ideally the system would be suspended even when the screen is on. If there are no "trusted" applications running at the same time, then openoffice wouldn't load at all. Right? -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists