[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTing0RpAoYstVs1G5v-eZ0q6qGjrGiphUvBdOsaS@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:25:04 +0300
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
david@...g.hm, Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arve@...roid.com, mjg59@...f.ucam.org, pavel@....cz,
florian@...kler.org, rjw@...k.pl, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, menage@...gle.com,
david-b@...bell.net, James.Bottomley@...e.de, arjan@...radead.org,
swmike@....pp.se, galibert@...ox.com, dipankar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 08:18:22PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>> You are tightly linking suspend blockers with Android. If they were a
>> sensible general solution they would be generic not tied closely to
>> Android
>
> Android is certainly where suspend blockers originated, and is to the best
> of my knowledge is still the only platform that uses them. But there is
> a first user of every new mechanism, and for some time that first user
> will by definition be the only user of that mechanism. So the fact
> that Android is most probably the only user of suspend blockers does
> not prove anything about whether or not suspend blockers are sensible.
No, it's the fact that *nobody* else has said: hey, that looks like a
good idea, we should use that in our mobile platform (or any
platform).
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists