[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100813113555.064f6975@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:35:55 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>
Cc: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
david@...g.hm, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arve@...roid.com,
mjg59@...f.ucam.org, pavel@....cz, florian@...kler.org,
rjw@...k.pl, stern@...land.harvard.edu, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, menage@...gle.com, david-b@...bell.net,
James.Bottomley@...e.de, arjan@...radead.org, swmike@....pp.se,
galibert@...ox.com, dipankar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three
> Why do people care that "android is forking the kernel"?
A lot of us don't. That's what the GPL is about. It's a big pain if you
start splitting it off into two entire things long term - because
your maintenance grows harder exponentially but parallel forks are common
- SuSE and RHEL Enterprise type editions are forks for example.
As far as I can tell it all comes from one or two people with a big PR
presence and almost no code in the kernel saying silly things years ago
which the IT press see as a good way to create a 'we need a column, bash
someone' story.
"What the junk press think" is a common but broken way to run national
policy in some countries, and its just as broken for the kernel.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists