[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100813113914.487394e1@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:39:14 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, david@...g.hm,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arve@...roid.com, mjg59@...f.ucam.org, pavel@....cz,
florian@...kler.org, rjw@...k.pl, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, menage@...gle.com, david-b@...bell.net,
James.Bottomley@...e.de, arjan@...radead.org, swmike@....pp.se,
galibert@...ox.com, dipankar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three
> I have a similar problem with the whole pm_qos subsystem, as I've said
> earlier. If some badly behaved application claims to want 0us
> wireless latency, and keeps the radio on all the time, there is no way
> for me to find out which is the badly behaved application --- even
Well firstly you want limits so SELinux says "No" (or rlimit or similar)
and secondly you want sysfs views.
This is like file permissions - its not hard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists