[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C654100.3060307@vlnb.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:56:32 +0400
From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: jaxboe@...ionio.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
hch@....de, James.Bottomley@...e.de, tytso@....edu,
chris.mason@...cle.com, swhiteho@...hat.com,
konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp, dm-devel@...hat.com, jack@...e.cz,
rwheeler@...hat.com, hare@...e.de,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] block: kill QUEUE_ORDERED_BY_TAG
Hello Tejun,
Tejun Heo, on 08/12/2010 04:41 PM wrote:
> Nobody is making meaningful use of ORDERED_BY_TAG now and queue
> draining for barrier requests will be removed soon which will render
> the advantage of tag ordering moot.
Have you seen Hannes Reinecke's and my measurements in
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=128110662528485&w=2 and
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=128111995217405&w=2 correspondingly?
If yes, what else evidences do you need to see that the tag ordering is
a big performance win?
Vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists