[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <h6hc66dkok3im9jpph1oj2m40ijju6c9la@4ax.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:34:55 +1000
From: Grant Coady <gcoady.lk@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
stable-review@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [0/3] 2.6.27.52 stable review
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:47:29 -0700, you wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:12:57PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Grant Coady <gcoady.lk@...il.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Machine is running, but there's a lot of these in the dmesg:
>> >
>> > WARNING: at include/linux/security.h:1826 acct_stack_growth+0xe7/0xf0()
>>
>> That would seem to be because of the lack of commit 05fa199d45c in
>> 2.6.27. It got marked for stable, but probably never went so far back
>> as 2.6.27.
>
>Yup, I didn't include it there. Grant, if you add that, does the
>warning go away?
I'm sorry, no idea at all how to cherry pick that, I don't know git :(
Google brings up this thread but not that commit, point me at it and
I'll try it.
Grant.
>
>> That said, I do wonder if it is worth it maintaining a 2.6.27 that the
>> maintainer can't even boot on his machines any more.
>
>Yeah, I'm beginning to wonder about it as well. I think it's expected
>lifespan is very near to the end.
>
>thanks,
>
>greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists