[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008162243120.12526@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:43:25 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...sics.adelaide.edu.au>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] drivers/platform/x86: Use available error codes
Looks ok to me. Thanks.
julia
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> I've had a quick look at this and the idea behind it is sound. While it
> does change the symantics as noted in the original post, the change is only
> in an error path and to my eye the error code should be returned in that
> case - as the code currently stands a 0 is returned even if ENOMEM has
> occurred.
>
> It seems to me that error and result have been (wrongly) used interchangedly
> within these two functions (possibly be different authors). I agree that
> one of them should be eliminated, and error seems the sensible choice. So
> something like the following is probably in order.
>
> ===
>
> An error code is stored in the variable error, but it is the variable result
> that is returned instead. So store the error code in result and eliminate
> the unnecessary variable error. Initial report and patch from Julia Lawall
> <julia@...u.dk>.
>
> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @r@
> local idexpression x;
> constant C;
> @@
>
> if (...) { ...
> x = -C
> ... when != x
> (
> return <+...x...+>;
> |
> return NULL;
> |
> return;
> |
> * return ...;
> )
> }
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...sics.adelaide.edu.au>
>
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c 2010-03-16 02:39:39.000000000 +1030
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c 2010-08-17 02:37:18.556779664 +0930
> @@ -655,7 +655,6 @@
> int result = 0;
> int state = 0;
> struct input_dev *input;
> - int error;
>
> if (!device)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -667,7 +666,7 @@
>
> fujitsu->input = input = input_allocate_device();
> if (!input) {
> - error = -ENOMEM;
> + result = -ENOMEM;
> goto err_stop;
> }
>
> @@ -684,8 +683,8 @@
> set_bit(KEY_BRIGHTNESSDOWN, input->keybit);
> set_bit(KEY_UNKNOWN, input->keybit);
>
> - error = input_register_device(input);
> - if (error)
> + result = input_register_device(input);
> + if (result)
> goto err_free_input_dev;
>
> result = acpi_bus_get_power(fujitsu->acpi_handle, &state);
> @@ -810,7 +809,6 @@
> int result = 0;
> int state = 0;
> struct input_dev *input;
> - int error;
> int i;
>
> if (!device)
> @@ -824,16 +822,16 @@
>
> /* kfifo */
> spin_lock_init(&fujitsu_hotkey->fifo_lock);
> - error = kfifo_alloc(&fujitsu_hotkey->fifo, RINGBUFFERSIZE * sizeof(int),
> + result = kfifo_alloc(&fujitsu_hotkey->fifo, RINGBUFFERSIZE * sizeof(int),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (error) {
> + if (result) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "kfifo_alloc failed\n");
> goto err_stop;
> }
>
> fujitsu_hotkey->input = input = input_allocate_device();
> if (!input) {
> - error = -ENOMEM;
> + result = -ENOMEM;
> goto err_free_fifo;
> }
>
> @@ -853,8 +851,8 @@
> set_bit(fujitsu->keycode4, input->keybit);
> set_bit(KEY_UNKNOWN, input->keybit);
>
> - error = input_register_device(input);
> - if (error)
> + result = input_register_device(input);
> + if (result)
> goto err_free_input_dev;
>
> result = acpi_bus_get_power(fujitsu_hotkey->acpi_handle, &state);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists