[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008171140300.11174@router.home>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:41:52 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2/4] dio: add page locking for direct I/O
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:46:56AM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> > Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com> writes:
> >
> > > BTW, from the discussion with Christoph I noticed my misunderstanding
> > > about the necessity of additional page locking. It would seem that
> > > without page locking there is no danger of racing between direct I/O and
> > > page migration. So I retract this additional locking patch-set.
> >
> > OK, great! ;-)
>
> Well it sounds like we still may need something. It isn't good if O_DIRECT
> can starve (or DoS) migration.
Anything that increments a page refcount can interfere with migration and
cause migration to be aborted and retried later. Not something new. There
never was any guarantee that migration must succeed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists