[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100818001842.GC6928@localhost>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:18:42 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] HWPOISON, hugetlb: move PG_HWPoison bit check
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 05:27:36PM +0800, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> In order to handle metadatum correctly, we should check whether the hugepage
> we are going to access is HWPOISONed *before* incrementing mapcount,
> adding the hugepage into pagecache or constructing anon_vma.
> This patch also adds retry code when there is a race between
> alloc_huge_page() and memory failure.
This duplicates the PageHWPoison() test into 3 places without really
address any problem. For example, there are still _unavoidable_ races
between PageHWPoison() and add_to_page_cache().
What's the problem you are trying to resolve here? If there are
data structure corruption, we may need to do it in some other ways.
Thanks,
Fengguang
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git linux-mce-hwpoison/mm/hugetlb.c linux-mce-hwpoison/mm/hugetlb.c
> index a26c24a..5c77a73 100644
> --- linux-mce-hwpoison/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ linux-mce-hwpoison/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -2490,8 +2490,15 @@ retry:
> int err;
> struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
>
> - err = add_to_page_cache(page, mapping, idx, GFP_KERNEL);
> + lock_page(page);
> + if (unlikely(PageHWPoison(page))) {
> + unlock_page(page);
> + goto retry;
> + }
> + err = add_to_page_cache_locked(page, mapping,
> + idx, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (err) {
> + unlock_page(page);
> put_page(page);
> if (err == -EEXIST)
> goto retry;
> @@ -2504,6 +2511,10 @@ retry:
> page_dup_rmap(page);
> } else {
> lock_page(page);
> + if (unlikely(PageHWPoison(page))) {
> + unlock_page(page);
> + goto retry;
> + }
> if (unlikely(anon_vma_prepare(vma))) {
> ret = VM_FAULT_OOM;
> goto backout_unlocked;
> @@ -2511,22 +2522,19 @@ retry:
> hugepage_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, address);
> }
> } else {
> + /*
> + * If memory error occurs between mmap() and fault, some process
> + * don't have hwpoisoned swap entry for errored virtual address.
> + * So we need to block hugepage fault by PG_hwpoison bit check.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(PageHWPoison(page))) {
> + ret = VM_FAULT_HWPOISON;
> + goto backout_unlocked;
> + }
> page_dup_rmap(page);
> }
>
> /*
> - * Since memory error handler replaces pte into hwpoison swap entry
> - * at the time of error handling, a process which reserved but not have
> - * the mapping to the error hugepage does not have hwpoison swap entry.
> - * So we need to block accesses from such a process by checking
> - * PG_hwpoison bit here.
> - */
> - if (unlikely(PageHWPoison(page))) {
> - ret = VM_FAULT_HWPOISON;
> - goto backout_unlocked;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> * If we are going to COW a private mapping later, we examine the
> * pending reservations for this page now. This will ensure that
> * any allocations necessary to record that reservation occur outside
> --
> 1.7.2.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists