[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100817034634.GB24726@drongo>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:46:34 +1000
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] perf: Generalize some arch callchain code
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:48:32PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> - Most archs use one callchain buffer per cpu, except x86 that needs
> to deal with NMIs. Provide a default perf_callchain_buffer()
> implementation that x86 overrides.
>
> - Centralize all the kernel/user regs handling and invoke new arch
> handlers from there: perf_callchain_user() / perf_callchain_kernel()
> That avoid all the user_mode(), current->mm checks and so...
>
> - Invert some parameters in perf_callchain_*() helpers: entry to the
> left, regs to the right, following the traditional (src, dst).
I think you mean (dst, src), don't you?
Apart from that, the patch looks OK, so
Acked-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists