linux-kernel - [Patch] vmcore: it is not experimental any more

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:48:28 +0800
From:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, nhorman@...hat.com
Subject: [Patch] vmcore: it is not experimental any more


We use vmcore in our production kernel for a long time,
it is pretty stable now. So I don't think we need to mark
it as experimental any more.

Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>

---
diff --git a/fs/proc/Kconfig b/fs/proc/Kconfig
index 50f8f06..3df4257 100644
--- a/fs/proc/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/proc/Kconfig
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ config PROC_KCORE
 	depends on PROC_FS && MMU
 
 config PROC_VMCORE
-        bool "/proc/vmcore support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
+        bool "/proc/vmcore support"
         depends on PROC_FS && CRASH_DUMP
 	default y
         help
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/