linux-kernel - Re: [Patch] vmcore: it is not experimental any more

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100822165645.GB29702@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date:	Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:56:45 -0400
From:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>
To:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] vmcore: it is not experimental any more

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:48:28PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
> 
> We use vmcore in our production kernel for a long time,
> it is pretty stable now. So I don't think we need to mark
> it as experimental any more.
> 
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/proc/Kconfig b/fs/proc/Kconfig
> index 50f8f06..3df4257 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/proc/Kconfig
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ config PROC_KCORE
>  	depends on PROC_FS && MMU
>  
>  config PROC_VMCORE
> -        bool "/proc/vmcore support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> +        bool "/proc/vmcore support"
>          depends on PROC_FS && CRASH_DUMP
>  	default y
>          help
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/