lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100818194410.GA17421@suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:44:10 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Patrick Pannuto <ppannuto@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	magnus.damm@...il.com, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Magnus Damm <damm@...nsource.se>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] platform: Use drv->driver.bus instead of assuming
 platform_bus_type

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:15:40PM -0700, Patrick Pannuto wrote:
> In theory (although not *yet* in practice), a driver being passed
> to platform_driver_probe might have driver.bus set to something
> other than platform_bus_type. Locking drv->driver.bus is always
> correct.
> 
> Change-Id: Ib015c35237eb5493d17a812576a3a9906e1344d4

What is that field?  Why did you add it?

confused,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ