linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] platform: Use drv->driver.bus instead of assuming platform_bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C6C3A28.8070108@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:53:12 -0700
From:	Patrick Pannuto <ppannuto@...eaurora.org>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	magnus.damm@...il.com, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Magnus Damm <damm@...nsource.se>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] platform: Use drv->driver.bus instead of assuming
 platform_bus_type

On 08/18/2010 12:44 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:15:40PM -0700, Patrick Pannuto wrote:
>> In theory (although not *yet* in practice), a driver being passed
>> to platform_driver_probe might have driver.bus set to something
>> other than platform_bus_type. Locking drv->driver.bus is always
>> correct.
>>
>> Change-Id: Ib015c35237eb5493d17a812576a3a9906e1344d4
> 
> What is that field?  Why did you add it?
> 
> confused,
> 
> greg k-h

Ugh... It's from gerrit; forgot to remove them, sorry.

Do you want a fresh set, or can you just ignore them for now?

-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/