[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85878.24188.qm@web84204.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: "D. Stussy" <kd6lvw@...izon.net>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luca@...a-barbieri.com,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86, asm: Refactor atomic64_386_32.S to support old binutils and be cleaner
Has this patch been posted to the 2.6.35 kernel also, or just to 2.6.36? I don't think it's been posted to 2.6.35 where the problem it corrects was introduced.
"Greg KH" <gregkh@...e.de> has made a last call (tomorrow - Aug 20) for chnges for 2.6.35.3 and doesn't seem to have this. It's not in the prior two updates either.....
--- On Wed, 8/11/10, tip-bot for Luca Barbieri <luca@...a-barbieri.com> wrote:
> Commit-ID: 30246557a06bb20618bed906a06d1e1e0faa8bb4
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/30246557a06bb20618bed906a06d1e1e0faa8bb4
> Author: Luca Barbieri <luca@...a-barbieri.com>
> AuthorDate: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 04:04:38 +0200
> Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> CommitDate: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:03:28 -0700
>
> x86, asm: Refactor atomic64_386_32.S to support old
> binutils and be cleaner
>
> The old code didn't work on binutils 2.12 because setting a symbol to
> a register apparently requires a fairly recent version.
>
> ...
>
> This fixes kernel bugzilla 16506.
...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists