linux-kernel - Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86, asm: Refactor atomic64_386_32.S to support old binutils and be cleaner

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C6DA0C0.6020808@zytor.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:23:12 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	"D. Stussy" <kd6lvw@...izon.net>
CC:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luca@...a-barbieri.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86, asm: Refactor atomic64_386_32.S to support
 old binutils and be cleaner

On 08/19/2010 12:06 PM, D. Stussy wrote:
> Has this patch been posted to the 2.6.35 kernel also, or just to 2.6.36?  I don't think it's been posted to 2.6.35 where the problem it corrects was introduced.
> 
> "Greg KH" <gregkh@...e.de> has made a last call (tomorrow - Aug 20) for chnges for 2.6.35.3 and doesn't seem to have this.  It's not in the prior two updates either.....

It was Cc: <stable@...nel.org>; it's up to Greg to include it or not.

[Greg: 30246557a06bb20618bed906a06d1e1e0faa8bb4]

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/