[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C738037.20201@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:17:59 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Oberparleiter <peter.oberparleiter@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the s390 tree
On 2010-08-24 09:13, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:53:28 +1000
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in
>> drivers/s390/char/tape_block.c between commit
>> 7dc74a8fdb22f4410a2d8e45353c9ea75821a9ba ("[S390] tape: fix kernel panic
>> when setting tape device offline") from the s390 tree and commit
>> 52cc2eef31587b22ce9fbe77b064a031a9613ab0 ("block: switch s390 tape_block
>> and mg_disk to elevator_change()") from the block tree.
>>
>> I assume that the latter removes the need for the former, so I used that.
>
> The patch in the block tree includes the fix for the s390 tape driver.
> So I guess its best if I remove the s390 specific patch from the
> git390 tree.
>
Probably best, since the change in my tree is different from the
one you likely merged. So it will clash, as Stephen also reports.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists