linux-kernel - Re: workqueue destruction BUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C73C425.20503@kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:07:49 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: workqueue destruction BUG_ON

Hello,

On 08/24/2010 03:10 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> From 492a242b75b0abae3b1c17b4a654ab9ef67e612d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
>> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:22:47 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: improve destroy_workqueue() debuggability
> 
> With this patch applied I still get just the BUG_ON:

Hmmm... weird.

> [  500.874185] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [  500.875212] kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:2849!

Are you sure you're running the patched kernel?  With the patch
applied, the BUG_ON() wouldn't be on line 2849 (on both rc1 and 2).

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/