[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100824113116.249c13b4@virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:31:16 -0700
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: fix vblank wait test condition
When converting this to the new wait_for macro I inverted the wait
condition, which causes all sorts of problems. So correct it to fix
several failures caused by the bad wait (flickering, bad output
detection, tearing, etc.).
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Tested-by: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...oo.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 6ccb797..dd90b80 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ void intel_wait_for_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe)
/* Wait for vblank interrupt bit to set */
if (wait_for((I915_READ(pipestat_reg) &
- PIPE_VBLANK_INTERRUPT_STATUS) == 0,
+ PIPE_VBLANK_INTERRUPT_STATUS),
50, 0))
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("vblank wait timed out\n");
}
--
1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists