[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100825081336.GA30504@sucs.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:13:36 +0100
From: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...oo.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: fix vblank wait test condition
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:31:16AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> When converting this to the new wait_for macro I inverted the wait
> condition, which causes all sorts of problems. So correct it to fix
> several failures caused by the bad wait (flickering, bad output
> detection, tearing, etc.).
Further testing has shown this fixed one set of cases where strange
behaviour happened on my EeePC but there are other triggers. I've found
the following:
With this patch booting without a battery in the machine will lead to a
stable system without lots of errors appearing in dmesg (just one
"Insufficient FIFO" at boot). Doing "watch --differences=cumulative
xrandr" always shows the same outputs. VT switching occasionally causes
the occasional "*ERROR* vblank wait timed out" message. However doing a
suspend/resume brings back all the problems, dmesg starts filling up
with FIFO errors and xrandr starts reporting different outputs every
time it is called. Additionally, booting with a battery inside the
machine at boot will always lead to the quirky behaviour too.
--
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists