[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100824211016.GA7176@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:10:16 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Samo Pogacnik <samo_pogacnik@....net>
Cc: linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-embedded <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] detour TTY driver - now ttyprintk
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:57:50PM +0200, Samo Pogacnik wrote:
> On 25.06.2010 (Fri) at 12:03 +0100 Alan Cox wrote:
> > With my devices.txt owner hat on I'll allocate the minor as you suggest
> > (and double check this causes no problems), with my tty hat on can you
> > send it to GregKH for merging into the tree.
>
> Hi,
>
> I hope that this TTY driver is ok for merging. It is very basic -
> removed all flow control and rate limiting. Patch has been generated
> against 2.6.34 kernel version.
>
> Ttyprintk is a pseudo TTY driver, which allows users to make printk messages,
> via output to ttyprintk device. It is possible to store "console" messages
> inline with kernel messages for better analyses of the boot process, for
> example.
Why does this need to be a tty driver? Why not a misc device?
And what about the normal way of just writing to /dev/kmsg to do this?
Why a whole new driver for this same functionality?
confused,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists