linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: tps6586x-regulator - fix bit_mask parameter for tps6586x_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:53:34 +0100
From:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To:	Mike Rapoport <mike@...pulab.co.il>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Gary King <gking@...dia.com>, Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: tps6586x-regulator - fix bit_mask
 parameter for tps6586x_set_bits()

On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:09 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: 
> Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:42:42PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> >> The third parameter of tps6586x_set_bits() is the bit_mask,
> >> thus we should use (1 << ri->go_bit) instead of ri->go_bit.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> > 
> > but I'd be much happier if someone who actually has the hardware could
> > verify that this is OK.
> 
> I don't have the hardware handy at the moment.
> Gary, can you please verify the fix?
> 

Do we have any news on this testing ? I'd like to have these upstream
for rc3.

Thanks

Liam
-- 
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/