linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v3] perf, x86: try to handle unknown nmis with running perfctrs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100826090008.GA22783@erda.amd.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Aug 2010 11:00:08 +0200
From:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
	"fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3] perf, x86: try to handle unknown nmis with running
 perfctrs

On 25.08.10 16:11:06, Don Zickus wrote:
> >  cpu #15, nmi #160, marked #0, handled = 1, time = 333392635730, delta = 11238255
> >  cpu #15, nmi #161, marked #0, handled = 1, time = 333403779380, delta = 11143650
> >  cpu #15, nmi #162, marked #0, handled = 1, time = 333415418497, delta = 11639117
> >  cpu #15, nmi #163, marked #0, handled = 1, time = 333415467084, delta = 48587
> >  cpu #15, nmi #164, marked #0, handled = 1, time = 333415501531, delta = 34447
> >  cpu #15, nmi #165, marked #0, handled = 1, time = 333459918106, delta = 44416575
> >  cpu #15, nmi #166, marked #0, handled = 0, time = 333459923167, delta = 1666
> >  cpu #15, nmi #151, marked #0, handled = 1, time = 332978597882, delta = 11447002
> >  cpu #15, nmi #152, marked #0, handled = 1, time = 332978657151, delta = 59269
> >  cpu #15, nmi #153, marked #0, handled = 1, time = 332978667847, delta = 10696
> >  cpu #15, nmi #154, marked #0, handled = 1, time = 333023125757, delta = 44457910
> >  cpu #15, nmi #155, marked #0, handled = 1, time = 333291980833, delta = 268855076
> >  cpu #15, nmi #156, marked #0, handled = 1, time = 333325663125, delta = 33682292
> >  cpu #15, nmi #157, marked #0, handled = 1, time = 333348216481, delta = 22553356
> >  cpu #15, nmi #158, marked #0, handled = 1, time = 333370168887, delta = 21952406
> >  cpu #15, nmi #159, marked #0, handled = 1, time = 333381397475, delta = 11228588
> >  Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 00 on CPU 15.
> >  Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
> >  Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
> 
> So I found a Nehalem box that can reliably reproduce Ingo's problem using
> something as simple 'perf top'.  But like above, I am noticing the
> samething, an extra NMI(PMI??) that comes out of nowhere.

This could also be a race in the counter handling code, or we do not
proper count the number of handled counters. Maybe 2 counters actually
fired but we only noticed one counter and then accidentially cleared
the 2nd without processing it.

-Robert

-- 
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/