linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] compaction: handle active and inactive fairly in too_many

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:03:05 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Iram Shahzad <iram.shahzad@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] compaction: handle active and inactive fairly
	in too_many_isolated

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:31:18AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Iram reported compaction's too_many_isolated loops forever.
> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg08123.html)
> 
> The meminfo of situation happened was inactive anon is zero.
> That's because the system has no memory pressure until then.
> While all anon pages was in active lru, compaction could select
> active lru as well as inactive lru. That's different things
> with vmscan's isolated. So we has been two too_many_isolated.
> 
> While compaction can isolated pages in both active and inactive,
> current implementation of too_many_isolated only considers inactive.
> It made Iram's problem.
> 
> This patch handles active and inactive with fair.
> That's because we can't expect where from and how many compaction would
> isolated pages.
> 
> This patch changes (nr_isolated > nr_inactive) with
> nr_isolated > (nr_active + nr_inactive) / 2.
> 
> Cc: Iram Shahzad <iram.shahzad@...fujitsu.com>
> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
> Acked-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>

Please send this patch on its own as it looks like it should be merged and
arguably is a stable candidate for 2.6.35. Alternatively, Andrew, can you pick
up just this patch? It seems unrelated to the second patch on COMPACTPAGEFAILED.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/