[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008270059240.2768@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:02:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
cc: Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@...il.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hrtimer: make epoll_wait() use the hrtimer range
feature
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Aug 2010, Shawn Bohrer wrote:
>
> > This make epoll use hrtimers for the timeout value which prevents
> > epoll_wait() from timing out up to a millisecond early.
> >
> > This mirrors the behavior of select() and poll().
>
> I saw this now, since I got notifications from Andrew's patch machine.
> Is this really needed?
Yes, as it is the last user space interface which is jiffies based.
> Is that really worth the extra code in the fast path?
It's not that much overhead and we had no complaints when we converted
everything else
> Aren't we breaking existing behavior?
We had no problems when we moved all the other interfaces over
> I have some doubts.
/me not - though I need to look at the patch itself
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists