[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008261612230.25446@makko.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:23:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc: Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@...il.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hrtimer: make epoll_wait() use the hrtimer range
feature
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Aug 2010, Shawn Bohrer wrote:
> >
> > > This make epoll use hrtimers for the timeout value which prevents
> > > epoll_wait() from timing out up to a millisecond early.
> > >
> > > This mirrors the behavior of select() and poll().
> >
> > I saw this now, since I got notifications from Andrew's patch machine.
> > Is this really needed?
>
> Yes, as it is the last user space interface which is jiffies based.
What? You killed jiffies?! :)
Alright then, the patch itself, besides the different bahavior on timeout
greater/equal to EP_MAX_MSTIMEO (which is not documented, hence does not
exist), looks OK to me.
- Davide
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists