[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100827095546.GC6803@random.random>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:55:46 +0200
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix hang on anon_vma->root->lock
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 06:43:31PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> some light., I think you're mistaking the role that RCU plays here.
That's exactly correct, I thought it prevented reuse of the slab
entry, not only of the whole slab... SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU is a lot more
tricky to use than I though...
However at the light of this, I think page_lock_anon_vma could have
returned a freed and reused anon_vma well before the anon-vma changes.
The anon_vma could have been freed after the first page_mapped check
succeed but before taking the spinlock. I think, it worked fine
because the rmap walks are robust enough just not to fall apart on a
reused anon_vma while the lock is hold. It become a visible problem
now because we were unlocking the wrong lock leading to a
deadlock. But I guess it wasn't too intentional to return a reused
anon_vma out of page_lock_anon_vma.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists