linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: fix hang on anon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTikvB1fN42A91ZdEHyEXnz2bGw9Q21dJcfa3PBP0@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:43:43 -0700
From:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix hang on anon_vma->root->lock

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 06:43:31PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>> some light., I think you're mistaking the role that RCU plays here.
>
> That's exactly correct, I thought it prevented reuse of the slab
> entry, not only of the whole slab... SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU is a lot more
> tricky to use than I though...
>
> However at the light of this, I think page_lock_anon_vma could have
> returned a freed and reused anon_vma well before the anon-vma changes.
>
> The anon_vma could have been freed after the first page_mapped check
> succeed but before taking the spinlock. I think, it worked fine
> because the rmap walks are robust enough just not to fall apart on a
> reused anon_vma while the lock is hold. It become a visible problem
> now because we were unlocking the wrong lock leading to a
> deadlock. But I guess it wasn't too intentional to return a reused
> anon_vma out of page_lock_anon_vma.

What you say there is all exactly right, except for "I guess it wasn't
too intentional": it was intentional, and known that it all worked out
okay in the rare case when a reused anon_vma got fed into the loops -
the anon_vma, after all, is nothing more than a list of places where
you may find the page mapped, it has never asserted that a page will
be found everywhere that the anon_vma lists.

I would have liked to say "well known" above, but perhaps well known
only to me: you're certainly not the first to be surprised by this.
IIRC both Christoph and Peter have at different times proposed patches
to tighten up page_lock_anon_vma() to avoid returning a stale/reused
anon_vma, probably both were dropped because neither was actually
necessary, until now: I guess it's a good thing for understandability
that anon_vma->root->lock now requires that we weed out that case.

Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/