linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 14/43] ptrace, frv: change signature of arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7665.1282915390@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:23:10 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 14/43] ptrace, frv: change signature of arch_ptrace()

Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com> wrote:

> In this series, 3/43 changes the prototype of arch_ptrace() in
> include/linux/ptrace.h and the following patches change it for each arch in
> arch/xxx/kernel/ptrace.c. Do you mean all of arch change patches should be
> combinded into a patch?

If patch 3 breaks all architectures, such that none of them then compile, this
is bad.  The fixes should be combined into that patch.

If it breaks them such that there are warnings, but they still compile, we can
probably live with that, but it's still icky.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/