linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3 v2] dmaengine: Add Freescale i.MX SDMA support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:30:05 +0200
From:	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>
To:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v2] dmaengine: Add Freescale i.MX SDMA support

Dne So 28. srpna 2010 18:18:58 Sascha Hauer napsal(a):
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 05:27:10PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dne So 28. srpna 2010 17:18:17 Linus Walleij napsal(a):
> > > 2010/8/23 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>:
> > > >> +     evt = readl(SDMA_H_EVTOVR);
> > > >> +     mcu = readl(SDMA_H_HOSTOVR);
> > > >> +     dsp = readl(SDMA_H_DSPOVR);
> > > > 
> > > > __raw_readl?
> > > 
> > > Sorry I never understood this __raw_[read|write][b|w|l] vs.
> > > plain read[b|w|l] proliferation in some drivers and code.
> > > 
> > > What's the reason for?
> > 
> > Hey,
> > 
> > this trick is, if you create the VA<->PA mapping at the kernel start (eg.
> > see how pxa_map_io() is replacedon some devices for instance), you then
> > use the VA address you specified and use __raw_{read,write}[b,w,l](). So
> > use __raw_{read,write}[b,w,l]() on drivers specific for certain device
> > and use {read,write}[b,w,l]() on ioremap()ed memory areas, aka. in
> > common drivers.
> 
> Nope, this has nothing to do with static mappings vs. ioremap. The
> difference is that read[b,w,l] do little endian accesses suitable for
> PCI whereas the __raw_* functions do accesses in CPU endianess.
> Peripherals integrated into a SoC like the SDMA engine here are
> normally accessible in native endianess and thus need the __raw_*
> functions. An external network controller (for example a LAN9117) will
> probably need the non raw functions. Note that 99% of the arm users use
> little endian only and thus cpu_to_le* is a noop, so both types will work
> for most people.

Sorry, you got me here. Why do we have io{read,write} then btw. ? That's for 
x86's io space, right ?

Thanks, cheers and sorry for the confusion
> 
> Sascha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/