[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100828163725.GI9832@bicker>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:37:25 +0200
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Cc: Thomas Dahlmann <dahlmann.thomas@...or.de>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-geode@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] drivers/usb/gadget: Remove double test
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 05:41:01PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> This is a guess as to what the code should be. Perhaps something else
> should have been tested instead.
>
> drivers/usb/gadget/amd5536udc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/amd5536udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/amd5536udc.c
> index 731150d..6c40c99 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/amd5536udc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/amd5536udc.c
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static void print_regs(struct udc *dev)
> DBG(dev, "DMA mode = PPBNDU (packet per buffer "
> "WITHOUT desc. update)\n");
> dev_info(&dev->pdev->dev, "DMA mode (%s)\n", "PPBNDU");
> - } else if (use_dma && use_dma_ppb_du && use_dma_ppb_du) {
> + } else if (use_dma && use_dma_ppb_du) {
My guess is that "use_dma_ppb" was intended.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists