linux-kernel - Re: Comments to apparmor Makefile (and security/Makefile)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C797273.2030601@canonical.com>
Date:	Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:32:51 -0700
From:	John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Comments to apparmor Makefile (and security/Makefile)

On 08/28/2010 12:21 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>
>>> 8) From security/Makefile:
>>>
>>>     obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR)         += apparmor/built-in.o
>>> This is _not_ how we do it.
>>>
>>> We say just:
>>>
>>>     obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR)         += apparmor/
>>>
>>> [security/Makefile has this issue in several places]
>>>
>> okay, I set it up this way to conform to other entries in the file
>> If we are going to fix apparmor's entry we should fix them all
> 
> Agreed - its better to fix them all in one go.
> I assume you do this in a follow-up patch - it is straightforward.
> 

Yes, I was planning to submit as a separate patch.

thanks
john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/