[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1009021513040.10859@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:15:37 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
cc: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vaurora@...hat.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jblunck@...e.de, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
On Monday 2010-08-30 12:18, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>
>> My comment about set-theory unions being commutative set me thinking. I
>> really don't think "union" is the right name for this thing. There is
>> nothing about it which really fits that proper definition of a union.
>
>We could call it overlayfs. People learn new names quickly :)
There is a much larger issue that you should be very well aware about —
"The name wanted to be a clever acronym for "Filesystem in
USErspace", but it turned out to be an unfortunate choice. The author
has since vowed never to name a project after a common term, not even
anything found more than a handful of times on Google."
overlayfs already exists. Right next to fuse on sourceforge...
Oh and I what I like to see is support for multiple readonly branches :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists