linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 2 Sep 2010 23:32:00 +1000
From:	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Cc:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vaurora@...hat.com,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jblunck@...e.de, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype

On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:15:37 +0200 (CEST)
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de> wrote:

> 
> On Monday 2010-08-30 12:18, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> >
> >> My comment about set-theory unions being commutative set me thinking.  I
> >> really don't think "union" is the right name for this thing.  There is
> >> nothing about it which really fits that proper definition of a union.
> >
> >We could call it overlayfs.  People learn new names quickly :)
> 
> There is a much larger issue that you should be very well aware about —
> 
> "The name wanted to be a clever acronym for "Filesystem in
> USErspace", but it turned out to be an unfortunate choice. The author
> has since vowed never to name a project after a common term, not even
> anything found more than a handful of times on Google."
> 
> overlayfs already exists. Right next to fuse on sourceforge...

lol


No, I mean it.  "Linux Over-Lays".  :-)

> 
> 
> Oh and I what I like to see is support for multiple readonly branches :)

I think we very nearly have that, assuming I understand your requirement
correctly.
The lower filesystem can itself be an overlay, providing it is mounted
read-only.

So if /mnt/ro1 /mnt/ro2 /mnt/ro3 are all read-only branches then

 mount -o ro,lowerdir=/mnt/ro1,upperdir=/mnt/ro2 meaninglessstring /mnt/ov1
 mount -o ro,lowerdir=/mnt/ov1,upperdir=/mnt/ro3 meaninglessstring /mnt/ov2
 mount -o lowerdir=/mnt/ov2,upperdir=/mnt/rw ignoreme /mnt/overlay

and /mnt/overlay will be the combination of 3 read-only filesystems and one
writable one.
(this doesn't work with the code as-is, but it is really just a few bug-fixes
away).

NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/