[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C7FFB85.7000006@vlnb.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:31:17 +0400
From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
scst-devel <scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
iscsitarget-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, stgt@...r.kernel.org
CC: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Ross Walker <rswwalker@...il.com>
Subject: [ANNOUNCE]: Comparison of features between different SCSI targets
(SCST, STGT, IET, LIO) updated
Hello,
I updated the Linux SCSI targets comparison page
http://scst.sourceforge.net/comparison.html, which compares features of
the existing Linux SCSI target subsystems. The comparison includes SCST,
STGT, IET and LIO. I added IET there, because it is the most used Linux
iSCSI target at the moment.
This page is intended to be a complete and fair feature-by-feature
comparison between the targets. The only thing I have not added there is
quality of various corner cases recovery, because I don't know how to
measure that. SCST is really good in this area, while some other targets
are often not too much, but I have no idea how to summarize it in an
objective view.
If you see I'm wrong somewhere or forgot something, you are welcome to
correct me and I will fix that.
Vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists